WikiLeaks logo
The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...

The Global Intelligence Files

The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

Re: [Fwd: [CT] NYC new surveillance cameras]

Released on 2012-08-09 18:00 GMT

Email-ID 383561
Date 2010-09-23 17:36:35

Connected with LAPD. Good call. Horace suggested the security director for
MGM Grand.

Regards, Fred

Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T


From: "R. Daniel Botsch"
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:34:50 -0400
To: Michael Maness; Fred
Subject: RE: [Fwd: [CT] NYC new surveillance cameras]

Mike and Fred,

If I understand the question correctly, the answer is that the systems
are connected. We have regional networks in which information sharing is
limited to that network. If a network has 25 sites, those 25 sites match
against each other's reports. They can also send reports to any other
site on the network and they can post reports to a network-wide bulletin
board. Sites cannot share information across networks.

However, we do cross-network matching here at the office. If we see
cross-network matches, we will contact each affected site, explain that
the individual(s) or vehicle they reported has been seen on another
network, and then offer to put the affected sites into direct contact. We
have not yet had a cross-network match. I think over time the different
networks will begin to unite. I'm not exactly being prescient here, as
there is already talk in Vegas and LA of combining their two networks.
Same here in DC. Let me know if this helps or if you need further

Thanks, Dan

From: Michael Maness
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:11 PM
To: Fred Burton
Cc: R. Daniel Botsch
Subject: RE: [Fwd: [CT] NYC new surveillance cameras]

Both: Some clients are already linked, and others can be if they choose.

With TrapWire all our clients feed a centralized database, so they are in
affect linked.

Several of our clients have also agreed to share the entirety of their SAR
reporting with certain other clients where it makes sense (i.e. all the
casinos in Vegas share with each other; private and public sector clients
in LA share with one another; etc.)

Dan: Can you give some more examples of data sharing between clients?

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Burton []
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 12:59 PM
To: Michael Maness
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [CT] NYC new surveillance cameras]

Reasonable to say the systems are linked or can be linked? Which is more
accurate? Thanks


NOTICE: This email message and all attachments transmitted with it are
intended solely for the use of the addressees and may contain legally
privileged, protected or confidential information. If you have received
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email reply
and please delete this message from your computer and destroy any copies.